72 of 112 programmes record a maximum
9 programmes advertise 100%. Not one says you get it on the first payout.
The profit split is recorded on this site the way firms publish it — as a maximum. Of the 9 programmes recording 100%, 5 carry no rule about the split at all, and the rest publish the condition attached to it: a payout cadence, a ladder across payouts, a paid upgrade, or a lower rate you start on.
More broadly, on 12 programmes at 9 firms the same programme’s own rules name a share below its recorded maximum. The ceiling and the rate are different numbers, and only one of them is on the pricing page.
The 9 that record 100%
| Firm | Programme | What the firm publishes about reaching it |
|---|---|---|
| The5ers | Hyper Growth | nothing recorded |
| The5ers | High Stakes | nothing recorded |
| The5ers | Bootcamp | nothing recorded |
| Funding Pips | 2 Step Standard | Reward cycle is chosen per payout: weekly at 60%, bi-weekly at 80%, monthly at 100%, or on demand at 90%. |
| E8 Markets | E8 One | Payout share climbs 80% → 90% → 100% across payouts. |
| City Traders Imperium | 1-Step Challenge | nothing recorded |
| City Traders Imperium | 2-Step Challenge | nothing recorded |
| City Traders Imperium | Instant Funding | You start on half the advertised account size, and the profit share starts at 50% rather than the 80% the challenges pay. Reaching the full size and a 70% share means clearing the first 10% milestone. |
| City Traders Imperium | Direct Funding | The same product as Instant Funding without the half-sized start: full balance from day one and a 70% profit share from the first trade — and CHEAPER for the same traded balance, not dearer. Instant’s $10,000 ticket starts you at $5,000 for $449, where Direct sells $5,000 outright for $229. An earlier reading of this page recorded Direct as costing roughly three times as much at the same traded size; the two published price ladders say the opposite, by about two to one. |
“Nothing recorded” means no rule about the split appears in what was read from that firm — a fact about the reading, not proof the firm publishes nothing. What it does mean is that the 100% is the only figure available, and a maximum on its own does not say when it applies.
Where a firm names a lower share than its own maximum
Reward share starts at 70% and rises to 80% from the third tier.
Reward cycle is chosen per payout: weekly at 60%, bi-weekly at 80%, monthly at 100%, or on demand at 90%.
The split is chosen at purchase and locked: 85% with no minimum days, or 95% requiring three profitable days of at least 0.5% per phase.
Payout share climbs 80% → 90% → 100% across payouts.
You start on half the advertised account size, and the profit share starts at 50% rather than the 80% the challenges pay. Reaching the full size and a 70% share means clearing the first 10% milestone.
The same product as Instant Funding without the half-sized start: full balance from day one and a 70% profit share from the first trade — and CHEAPER for the same traded balance, not dearer. Instant’s $10,000 ticket starts you at $5,000 for $449, where Direct sells $5,000 outright for $229. An earlier reading of this page recorded Direct as costing roughly three times as much at the same traded size; the two published price ladders say the opposite, by about two to one.
The profit share starts at 75%, rises to 85% for withdrawing over 10% profit within 30 days, and reaches 90% only after the account has doubled twice with consistent 10%-plus profits.
Fees above are the monthly-payout plans, which carry the 95% split; bi-weekly and on-demand plans are cheaper — $49 to $1,599 across the same sizes — and pay 80%.
SOLD AS FOUR PRODUCTS WITH ONE SET OF CAPS. Moneta price this as a two-by-two matrix — a consistency rule of 15% or 20%, and a profit split of 60% or 88% — and the daily and overall limits are identical across all four. The ladder above is the cheapest corner, 15% consistency at a 60% split. At $100,000 the four run $750, $999, $1,099 and $1,450; the dearest buys the looser consistency rule and the larger share, not more room.
The M2 Account Saver applies here too, so the 80% split can be cut to 50% permanently on a first 2% open-position breach.
The M2 Account Saver cuts the split to 50% permanently on a first 2% open-position breach and deactivates the account on a second.
The profit split is 85% with a 90% add-on, priced at $1.50 beside the $10 at checkout. The same checkout also sells a "100% profit split" add-on, which the rules article does not mention.
Every match is printed rather than counted, so a rule that only mentions a lower percentage in passing is visible as one instead of inflating a total.
Four ways a maximum is made conditional
A cadence menu. Funding Pips let the reward cycle be chosen at each payout and price it: weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, on demand 90%, monthly 100%. The recorded 100% exists only on the monthly branch, so on ten thousand dollars of funded profit the four choices pay $6,000, $8,000, $9,000 and $10,000 for identical trading. It is not even monotone in speed — weekly pays less than on demand.
A priced plan. Hola Prime sell the same choice once, at checkout: the monthly-payout plans carry 95% and the bi-weekly and on-demand plans are cheaper and pay 80%. So the cheaper plan is the dearer one for anybody who makes enough profit for fifteen points to outweigh the discount.
A ladder. E8 Markets publish that the payout share climbs 80% to 90% to 100% across payouts. The 100% is the last rung, and the record does not say how many payouts it takes.
A revocation. Maven Trading’s M2 Account Saver halves the split permanently when open-position drawdown reaches 2% of the balance, and deactivates the account on a second trigger. Two percent is below every loss limit recorded for the programmes it applies to, so the split can be cut by a move that does not come close to breaching the account.
And one firm that pays more for going faster
Audacity Capital's Ability Challenge runs the other way: "The profit share starts at 75%, rises to 85% for withdrawing over 10% profit within 30 days, and reaches 90% only after the account has doubled twice with consistent 10%-plus profits."
So the pattern is not that patience is always rewarded. It is narrower and more useful: wherever a firm attaches a condition to its headline split, the condition is worth reading, because it is where the difference between the advertised number and the first payment lives.
What this does not measure
- · 40 programmes record no maximum at all. Some publish contradictory figures, some publish none; either way they are absent from every count on this page, and from every profit-split comparison anywhere.
- · How deeply each firm was read. A programme with no recorded rule about its split may publish one on a page not read here. The silences are shown as silences rather than as findings.
- · Whether the money arrives. A split is a promise about a payment, and no published rule says whether a firm honours it. That is the difference that would matter most and the one nothing here can reach.
- · Scaling plans that raise a split over time. Several firms publish them. They move in the reader’s favour and are outside this page, which is about the gap between the advertised ceiling and the first payment.
Where these rules were read
The5ers — challenge programmes explained — read 2026-08-05
FundingPips Help Centre — account models — read 2026-08-05
E8 Markets Help Center — product overview — read 2026-08-05
City Traders Imperium — 2-Step Challenge — read 2026-08-06
FundedNext — CFD trading objectives — read 2026-08-05
Audacity Capital — trading guidelines — read 2026-08-06
Hola Prime — forex trading rules — read 2026-08-05
Moneta Funded — product offerings — read 2026-08-23
Maven Trading — FAQ — read 2026-08-23
Blue Guardian — account model rules — read 2026-08-18
Questions
- Which prop firms pay a 100% profit split?
- 9 programmes at 4 firms record it: The5ers, Funding Pips, E8 Markets, City Traders Imperium. The number is recorded here as a maximum, which is what the firms publish, and none of the 9 states that it applies to the first payout. 4 record how it is reached — across payouts, on a monthly cycle, or as a paid upgrade — and 5 record no rule about the split at all.
- Is the advertised profit split what I actually get?
- Not at first, wherever a firm publishes enough to tell. On 12 programmes at 9 firms the same programme's own rules name a share lower than its recorded maximum — Funding Pips' 2 Step Standard records 100% and publishes 60% on a weekly reward cycle. The maximum is a ceiling; what governs the first payment is elsewhere in the rules, and often not in a field any comparison reads.
- Why would a faster payout pay less?
- Because at two firms the cadence is the product being sold. Funding Pips let the cycle be chosen at each payout and price it: weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, on demand 90%, monthly 100%. Hola Prime sell the choice once, at checkout, and the monthly plan carrying the higher share also costs more. It does not run one way everywhere — Audacity Capital raise the share for withdrawing faster, not slower — but where a firm prices the cadence at all, the headline sits on the slower branch.
- Can a profit split be taken away once I have it?
- One firm on this site publishes a rule that does exactly that. Maven Trading’s M2 Account Saver halves the split permanently on a first 2% open-position drawdown and deactivates the account on a second, and 2% is below every loss limit recorded for the programmes it applies to. Several other firms publish scaling plans that raise a split over time; this is the only recorded rule that lowers one.