Prop firm challenges, brokers, and the arithmetic behind both
The numbers these firms publish do not say what they seem to
38 prop firm challenges, read from the firms’ own rules. At 1% risk per trade the chance a losing streak ends the attempt runs from 19% to >99% — and the programmes at either end publish figures that look much the same.
Every number here is computed from a document the firm or its regulator published, shown with the date it was read. Where a figure cannot be established, the page says so instead of estimating. How that works, and what it cost.
Start here
- One-step challenges, ranked Same published rules, outcomes tens of points apart
- Two-step challenges, ranked Where the difficulty ratio works, and the one programme that breaks it
- The risk each one needs 1% works on 2 of 38
- What an attempt really costs Almost nobody passes first time, and the refund reorders the list
- Your broker’s annual cost From your own spread, commission and swap
- What each regulator protects 9 of them, read from their own documents
Why so few figures, and why they are the ones worth having
Prop firm rules are published, dated and citable, so this site quotes them and computes from them: the difficulty ratio each firm could publish and none does, and the probability a losing streak ends an attempt before the target is reached.
Broker pricing is not. It moves weekly, lives inside the trading platform, and most brokers block automated collection outright. So there is no table of spreads here — there is a calculator that takes your own broker’s terms, which you can read off your platform in about a minute.
23 of 34 brokers here name the entity actually licensed, checked against the regulator’s own register. The rest are on the site and withheld from search until that can be established. The full method is here, including roughly 1,900 pricing figures that were deleted rather than maintained dishonestly.