OneFunded · 3 evaluations, one price list
The cheapest one produces the dearest funded account
At $25K the Value Challenge is the cheapest thing OneFunded sell, at $99. Costed against the chance of passing it, it is the most expensive route to a funded account of the three — $1,294 against the Core Challenge’s $515, a factor of 2.5.
That is not one row moving. Reordering the price list by what a funded account actually costs moves every position, at both sizes the three share.
$25K
| Programme | Target | Daily / overall | Ends after | Fails | Sticker | Per funded account |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Challenge | 13% | 5% / 10% | 5 losses | 73% | $139 | $515 |
| Flash Challenge | 10% | 4% / 6% | 4 losses | 84% | $159 | $964 |
| Value Challenge | 14% | 4% / 8% | 4 losses | 92% | $99 | $1,294 |
Ordered by the last column. By the one before it the order is Value, Core, Flash — its cheapest entry is this table’s third row, and its dearest is the second.
$100K
| Programme | Target | Daily / overall | Ends after | Fails | Sticker | Per funded account |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Challenge | 13% | 5% / 10% | 5 losses | 73% | $469 | $1,738 |
| Flash Challenge | 10% | 4% / 6% | 4 losses | 84% | $499 | $3,025 |
| Value Challenge | 14% | 4% / 8% | 4 losses | 92% | $349 | $4,562 |
Ordered by the last column. By the one before it the order is Value, Core, Flash — its cheapest entry is this table’s third row, and its dearest is the second.
Why the discount is the expensive one
The Value Challenge asks 14% of profit — the most of the three — behind 8% of room, which is the second-tightest of the three. More to make, less to make it with. At 1% risk that is 4 consecutive losses, and 92% of attempts end there.
A sticker $40 lower buys a programme you have to buy 3.5 times as often. Nothing here is hidden: the targets and the caps are on the same page as the prices, and multiplying them out is the whole of the correction.
The Core Challenge then does one more thing the others do not. The fee comes back, but not for passing: "Core: Yes, 100% refundable, reimbursed with your first payout after you become a OneFunded Trader." That payout needs fourteen days since the first funded position and a minimum balance, so the money returns weeks after the evaluation ends and only if you are still trading. Fail and nothing is returned.
Every figure above is a floor
Drawdown is equity-based throughout, so an open position alone can breach it: "Floating losses immediately affect drawdown / Open positions can trigger breaches / Equity, not balance, determines rule compliance."
The model counts a run of closed losing trades. On an equity-based cap a single open position can end the account while every one of those trades is still running, so the real failure rates are higher than the column above and the real cost per funded account is higher than the one beside it. All three carry the same rule, so the ordering is unaffected — which is the only claim this page makes.
What this does not measure
- · Independent attempts. 1/(1−p) assumes each retry is a fresh draw. A trader who fails and changes nothing is not drawing again from the same urn, and one who learns is drawing from a better one.
- · Two phases against one. Two of these are two-phase and one is not. The targets are summed, which flatters the two-phase programmes: each phase resets and each is its own chance to stop.
- · Whether you get paid. OneFunded publish no maximum profit split this site has read, so nothing above prices what a passed account earns — only what reaching one costs.
- · Two rules the firm has not reconciled. What the daily limit is a percentage of, and whether news trading is allowed, are each published two ways in OneFunded’s own documents. Both are recorded on the firm page, and neither is used in the figures here.
- · The assumptions themselves. Assumes each trade is independent. Correlated positions — three majors against the dollar — lose together and count as one. Assumes every trade risks the same amount. Raising size after a loss shortens the streak you can survive. Uses your stated win rate. If that came from a demo account or a good month, the figure below is optimistic.
Where these rules and prices were read
OneFunded — Terms and Conditions, clauses 13 and 14 — read 2026-08-23
Questions
- Which OneFunded challenge is cheapest?
- The Value Challenge on the sticker — $99 at $25K — and the most expensive of the three once you count failed attempts, at $1,294. It asks 14% of profit, the most of the three, behind 8% of room, which ends the attempt after 4 consecutive losses at 1% risk.
- What is the difference between the OneFunded Core, Flash and Value challenges?
- Core Challenge: 8% + 5%, 5% daily and 10% overall, 3 minimum trading days. Flash Challenge: 10%, 4% daily and 6% overall, 1 minimum trading days. Value Challenge: 8% + 6%, 4% daily and 8% overall, 4 minimum trading days. There is no time limit on any of them.
- Does OneFunded refund the challenge fee?
- On the Core Challenge only, and not for passing. The fee comes back, but not for passing: "Core: Yes, 100% refundable, reimbursed with your first payout after you become a OneFunded Trader." That payout needs fourteen days since the first funded position and a minimum balance, so the money returns weeks after the evaluation ends and only if you are still trading. Fail and nothing is returned.
- Which OneFunded challenge is most likely to pass?
- The Core Challenge, at 27% against Flash 16% and Value 8%, under 1% risk per trade, a 40% win rate and 2R winners. Assumes each trade is independent. Correlated positions — three majors against the dollar — lose together and count as one.
- Is OneFunded’s drawdown measured on balance or equity?
- Equity, throughout. Drawdown is equity-based throughout, so an open position alone can breach it: "Floating losses immediately affect drawdown / Open positions can trigger breaches / Equity, not balance, determines rule compliance." That makes every failure figure on this page a floor rather than an estimate: the model counts closed losing trades, and an open position can breach the account before any of them close.