For Traders · 4 forex evaluations
A 2% target behind the same caps as a 9% one
For Traders sell 4 forex evaluations. 2 of them have exactly the caps Pay After Pass has — 3% a day inside 6% overall — and ask 9% and 10% of profit. Pay After Pass asks 2%, the lowest of the 90 evaluations read for this site.
At $100K that is about $574 per funded account against $4,682 on Classic (Forex) — 8.2 times cheaper, on the same firm’s own price list. Two of the four cost more than that and the table will not say how much more.
The four, at $100K
| Programme | Target | Daily / overall | Fails | Entry | On passing | Per funded account |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay After Pass (Forex) | 2% | 3% / 6% | 42% | $49 | $489 | $574 |
| Classic (Forex) | 13% | 4% / 8% | 91% | $434 | — | $4,682 |
| Fast (Forex) | 9% | 3% / 6% | 95% | $351 | — | more than $7,020 |
| Fast Static (Forex) | 10% | 3% / 6% | 97% | $449 | — | more than $8,980 |
The entry fee is paid on every attempt; the amount charged on passing is paid once, on the attempt that succeeds. Two rows compute past 20 expected attempts, where dividing by what is left of one stops meaning anything, and are printed as floors.
The second half of the price has a clock, and the contract leaves it blank
The activation fee is time-limited: "Activation fee must be paid within 5 days from passing or account will be cancelled." The Terms and Conditions never fill the number in — clause 6.4 reads "within [X] days" — so the five days come from the help centre alone.
So the deadline that decides whether the evaluation you have passed becomes an account is published in a help centre and left as a placeholder in the document you agreed to. Five days is not long to find $489, and it starts the moment you succeed rather than the moment you notice.
The entry fee is not refundable whatever happens: "The entry fee covers access to the evaluation environment and is non-refundable regardless of outcome."
Both halves, per size
| Account | Entry | Activation | Both |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25K | $9 | $189 | $198 |
| $50K | $9 | $329 | $338 |
| $100K | $49 | $489 | $538 |
Why the number is an estimate rather than a floor
Several of the best figures on this site are floors: they come from programmes whose drawdown follows the equity high inside the session, where the published percentage overstates the real allowance and the model comes out optimistic.
This one does not. Pay After Pass trails the closed balance, and applying a cap at its starting level is accurate for a trailing drawdown rather than kind to it. So 42% is an estimate of the same quality as the ones beside it, not a best case.
The only programme here with no day requirement at all: "No minimum profitable days required — on either the Challenge or the Master account." That is the only programme here with no day requirement at all, so nothing forces the attempt to take time.
The account you reach is not the account you were assessed on, and For Traders publish the difference: The funded account is a different product from the challenge: a 20% consistency rule, a 2% floating-loss protection and a five-minute news window all appear only there. Eleven firms do something like it, and nothing above prices any of it.
What this does not measure
- · Whether you can pay in five days. The arithmetic assumes the activation fee is always paid. A passed evaluation that is cancelled for missing the deadline costs the entry fee and returns nothing, and no figure here covers that case.
- · The funded account. A consistency rule, a floating-loss limit and a news window all appear only after you are funded. The cost above buys the right to trade under rules the evaluation did not have.
- · The promotion. The entry half is currently discounted on the two smaller sizes. The activation half is not, and it is the larger number.
- · Everything in the assumptions. Assumes each trade is independent. Correlated positions — three majors against the dollar — lose together and count as one. Assumes every trade risks the same amount. Raising size after a loss shortens the streak you can survive. Uses your stated win rate. If that came from a demo account or a good month, the figure below is optimistic.
Where these rules and prices were read
For Traders — our rules — read 2026-08-23
Questions
- What is For Traders Pay After Pass?
- A split-fee evaluation: a small entry fee now and the rest only if you pass. $25K: $9 then $189, $50K: $9 then $329, $100K: $49 then $489. It asks 2% of profit, the lowest target of the 90 evaluations read for this site.
- How much does Pay After Pass really cost?
- Both halves, plus the entry fee on every attempt that fails. At $100K and 1% risk that comes to about $574 for a funded account — against $4,682 on For Traders's Classic (Forex), which is 8.2 times more, and more again on the two that compute past the attempt cap. The entry half is lost whatever happens: The entry fee is not refundable whatever happens: "The entry fee covers access to the evaluation environment and is non-refundable regardless of outcome."
- What happens if you do not pay the activation fee?
- The activation fee is time-limited: "Activation fee must be paid within 5 days from passing or account will be cancelled." The Terms and Conditions never fill the number in — clause 6.4 reads "within [X] days" — so the five days come from the help centre alone. The number is not in the contract, only in the help centre, and it decides whether an evaluation you have already passed becomes an account.
- Why is a 2% target so much cheaper per funded account?
- Because the caps are the same as on Fast (Forex) and Fast Static (Forex) — 3% daily inside 6% overall — and only the target differs. 2% against 9% and 10% is the whole difference, and it moves the modelled failure rate from 95% and 97% to 42%. Assumes each trade is independent. Correlated positions — three majors against the dollar — lose together and count as one.