Breakout · three plans, one daily limit
The thing they charge for cannot end a bad afternoon
Pro and Turbo have tighter drawdown parameters (5% and 3% respectively) that scale appropriately.
That is Breakout’s own description of what the price ladder buys, and it is accurate. The daily loss limit is 3% on all three — smaller than every one of those drawdowns — so a run of losses reaches it first on every plan, at every risk per trade. All three end after the same 3 full-risk losses.
What is left to separate them is the profit target, and the cheapest plan asks the least of it. At $100K that makes 1-Step Turbo both the $330 option and the one modelled least likely to fail.
What Breakout publish for each
| Plan | Target | Daily | Overall | Ends after | Fails | At $100K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Step Turbo | 9% | 3% | 3% | 3 losses | 95% | $330 |
| 1-Step Pro | 12% | 3% | 5% | 3 losses | 98% | $545 |
| 1-Step Classic | 10% | 3% | 6% | 3 losses | 97% | $800 |
The daily column is greyed because it is the same on all three and it is the column that decides. The “ends after” column is identical for the same reason.
| Account | $5K | $10K | $25K | $50K | $100K | $200K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Step Turbo | $20 | $40 | $95 | $180 | $330 | $660 |
| 1-Step Pro | $33 | $65 | $150 | $280 | $545 | $1,090 |
| 1-Step Classic | $45 | $85 | $215 | $400 | $800 | — |
On 1-Step Turbo, one bad day is the whole attempt
1-Step Turbo’s overall cap is 3% and its daily cap is 3%. They are the same number, which 2 of the 79 evaluations on this site manage, so on day one there is no second rope behind the first.
| Plan | Maximum-loss days to exhaust the overall cap |
|---|---|
| 1-Step Turbo | 1 |
| 1-Step Pro | 1.67 |
| 1-Step Classic | 2 |
Which is the reversal. The failure column above says the cheapest plan is the best of the three, and it is right about a single bad session — that is all it models. Over a bad fortnight the ordering turns over completely: 1-Step Turbo dies on the first maximal day and 1-Step Classic survives 2.
Neither number answers it alone
The model on this site counts a run of consecutive losing trades, which is the shape of one bad session. On that measure the 3% daily limit decides all three plans identically and the target breaks the tie, so the cheapest wins.
The overall drawdown is the rule for the other shape — the slow fortnight, the recovery that does not come, the string of small red days. Nothing here models that, and on that shape the ordering is exactly the one Breakout’s price list implies.
So the honest reading is that they are priced for a risk this site does not compute, and the figures above measure a risk the price list ignores. A trader who expects to be done in a week should read the failure column; one who expects to grind should read the table above it.
One more thing the arithmetic will not do: all three compute past 20 expected attempts at 1% risk, which is where dividing by what is left of one stops meaning anything. So no cost per funded account is printed here, on any of them.
What this does not measure
- · Losses spread across days. Stated twice above because it reverses the conclusion, which is not something to leave in a footnote.
- · Trading costs. Breakout are the one firm here that publishes them, and they are not in any figure above. On a 3% floor they matter more than anywhere else — the arithmetic is here.
- · That both caps are tested against equity. Breakout publish that floating profit and loss counts, so an open position alone can breach either. The model counts closed losses, so every figure above is a floor.
- · Everything in the assumptions. Assumes each trade is independent. Correlated positions — three majors against the dollar — lose together and count as one. Assumes every trade risks the same amount. Raising size after a loss shortens the streak you can survive. Uses your stated win rate. If that came from a demo account or a good month, the figure below is optimistic.
Where these rules and prices were read
Breakout — programme rules — read 2026-08-23
Questions
- What is the difference between Breakout Turbo, Pro and Classic?
- 1-Step Turbo: 9% target behind a 3% drawdown, 1-Step Pro: 12% target behind a 5% drawdown, 1-Step Classic: 10% target behind a 6% drawdown. The daily loss limit is 3% on all three, and none of them has a time limit or a minimum trading day requirement.
- Does the bigger drawdown on Classic help?
- Not inside a single session. The 3% daily limit is smaller than every overall cap Breakout sell, so a run of consecutive losses reaches it first on all three plans, at any risk per trade — and all three end after the same 3 full-risk losses. Across several bad days it helps a great deal, and that is exactly what the model on this page cannot see.
- Which Breakout plan is most likely to pass?
- 1-Step Turbo, the cheapest, at 95% failure against Classic 97% and Pro 98% at 1% risk per trade. The whole difference is the profit target, because the rule that ends all three is the same. Assumes each trade is independent. Correlated positions — three majors against the dollar — lose together and count as one.
- Why does 1-Step Turbo have the same daily and overall limit?
- Because Breakout sell it as the tightest plan, and at 3% the overall cap has nowhere to sit above a 3% daily one. Only 2 of the 79 evaluations on this site publish both caps at the same number. The consequence is not subtle: losing a full day on 1-Step Turbo does not cost you the day, it ends the attempt, because reaching one cap is reaching both.